| Mammogram: Still the Champ
for Early Detection
Mammograms are still the best screening exam for detecting breast cancer early.
By Carol Sorgen
(a freelance medical writer) |
|
Mammograms aren't perfect, but they're still the best
tool we have for detecting breast cancer in its early --
and most curable and treatable -- stages. That's the message
breast cancer specialists want women to hear -- and to heed.
"Mammograms detect only 85% of breast cancers," says Lauralyn
Markle, MD, medical director of MemorialCare Breast Center
at Saddleback Memorial Medical Center in Laguna Hills, Calif.
But 85% is a formidable number when it comes to such an important
screening test, she explains.
Because mammograms aren't foolproof, they are considered
one part of a three-pronged breast cancer detection program
for women, along with monthly breast self-exams and a clinical
exam conducted by a health care provider.
Seventy-five percent of breast cancer patients have no
family history of the disease, Markle tells WebMD, emphasizing
how important it is for all women to follow the generally
accepted recommendations of an annual screening mammogram,
annual clinical exam by a health care professional, and monthly
breast self-exam.
Begin Screenings at 40
While there has been debate in recent years on when to
begin receiving screening mammograms and how often to have
them, many organizations and health care professionals --
including the American College of Radiology, the American
Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute, and numerous
national women's groups -- recommend that women begin mammography
screening by the age of 40, or as suggested by their physician.
These groups also recommend clinical breast examinations
by a health care professional every three years between the
ages of 20 and 40, and every year for women 40 and over.
If you have a family history of breast cancer, see your
physician for advice about your individual situation, Markle
advises.
It's especially important for women in their 40s and 50s
to receive an annual mammogram because breast cancer that
strikes in younger age groups tends to be faster-growing.
Breast cancer can also appear in just a year, Markle says,
so if you skip your yearly mammogram, any cancer that might
be there has that much more opportunity to grow.
"The whole point is to find the cancer early when it's
curable," Markle emphasizes.
Where to Go
Your mammogram should be performed at a center that specializes
in breast care, Markle adds. "There should be technologists
and doctors whose specialty is mammography … going
somewhere where they just do a few a week doesn't cut it."
If you do not live near a major breast center, you can
have your mammograms sent out for a consultation, Markle
notes.
Mortality Rate Declines
According to the American College of Radiology, the breast
cancer mortality rate has declined by nearly 20% since 1990,
due in large part to more emphasis on regular mammograms
and improved treatment options. Still, not enough women are
including mammography in their health care routine, especially
women in high-risk groups including minorities, older women,
and women with low incomes.
"Women have a lot of reasons for not getting a mammogram," says
Cheryl Perkins, MD, senior clinical advisor to The Susan
G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. "They're too busy; they
don't have cancer in the family; they're afraid; the mammograms
are painful; they can't afford them."
There is no good excuse, however. Many health care centers,
for example, offer free or low-cost mammograms to women who
can't afford them or do not have health insurance. And if
you're concerned about the discomfort of a mammogram, you
are encouraged to talk to the technologist beforehand and
voice your concerns. "You should feel some pressure, but
a mammogram shouldn't be excruciatingly painful," Perkins
tells WebMD.
New Technologies Aid Effectiveness
While mammography is still the mainstay of breast imaging,
adjunct technologies are being used to increase its effectiveness,
says Elizabeth J. Angelakis, MD, chief of mammography at
Lahey Clinic in Burlington, Mass.
Computer-aided detection (CAD), for example, serves as
a second pair of eyes in reading a mammogram. Some radiologists
use a computer to help spot breast cancers on mammograms;
these techniques highlight suspicious areas. Digital mammography
allows an image of the breast to be manipulated electronically.
By zooming in areas or magnifying other parts of the breast,
this technique may offer some advantage over standard mammogram.
They do not however improve the rates of detection of breast
cancer.
Breast ultrasound and breast MRI (magnetic resonance
imaging) may also be used in conjunction with mammography
but as of yet do not replace mammography as the primary
method of screening for breast cancer.
A study that appeared in the Sept. 15, 2004 issue of The
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA),
however, reported that Canadian researchers have found
that breast MRIs may offer better results than mammography
for women at high risk.
In a six-year survey of 236 Canadian women between the
ages of 25 and 65, all of whom carried the BRCA1 or BRCA2
gene mutations (meaning they have up to an 85% lifetime
risk of developing breast cancer), the scientists screened
the women annually using four different methods: MRI, mammography,
ultrasound, and manual exams. During the course of the
study, researchers found 22 cancers. The breast MRI found
more than 75% of those, while mammography and ultrasound
found only a third. Breast exams found less than 10%. MRIs
also detected the cancers at an earlier stage, before they
had widely spread.
Because the study focused only on women with the BRCA
gene mutation, researchers aren't certain whether MRI is
a better diagnostic tool for women who don't carry the
gene.
site map Research continues on other new technologies as well,
including laser imaging. Clemson University physicist Huabei
Jiang is currently leading a five-year $1.38 million research
project funded by the National Institutes of Health to
study a laser-imaging system that would provide more accurate
views of breast tissue. Early testing showed the system
is able to detect some growths not detected by a mammogram.
It also successfully predicted whether tumors were benign
or malignant, which could lead to a reduction in the large
number of biopsies performed in the U.S. each year. If
the imaging system is proven successful in clinical trials,
it could be a viable addition to mammograms in the next
several years, says Jiang.
"Each imaging method offers additional information that,
when used properly together, can be very effective in evaluating
breast tissue," says Angelakis. But with respect to the
direction of breast imaging, "I think that mammography
will maintain its position as the first line of defense
against breast cancer, but that the addition of new methods
will aid in its early detection."
Published Sept. 27, 2004.
Medically Updated Sept. 6, 2005.
|